Debunking David Pakman: "Male Circumcision Is Beneficial!"

Circumcision advocates argue that performing this procedure on children and infants is justified because of its medical, hygienic, and aesthetic benefits. Here, I point out the many problems in all of these different arguments, ultimately concluding that circumcising children without their consent is deeply immoral and unjustified.

Support my videos on Patreon!:
Follow me on Twitter:
Text or audio version of this content is available on my website:

Thumbnail photos: Angelo Esslinger (whitesession)/Pixabay; Clker-Free-Vector-Images/Pixabay; joffi/Pixabay;

male,circumcision,circumcise,genital mutilation,female,FGM,medical,benefits,harmful,harms,complications,death,gone wrong,David Pakman,hygiene,STDs,penis,cancer,vagina,men,women,infants,children,consent,immoral,unethical,wrong,dangerous,sex,pleasure,reduction,sensitivity,penile,HPV,HIV,AIDS,Africa,CDC,AAP,report,findings,study,evidence,facts,UTI,risk,justified,unjustified,Christopher Hitchens,medicine,condoms,safe sex,religion,mens rights,men's rights,